From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelsey v. Hourigan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

473 CA 18–01954

08-22-2019

John A. KELSEY and Mary M. Kelsey, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Gerald E. HOURIGAN, Jr., Individually, and Doing Business as Gerald Hourigan Dairy Farm, Patricia J. Hourigan, Gerald E. Hourigan, Jr., and Patricia J. Hourigan, Individually and Doing Business as Hourigan's Udder Place, Defendants–Appellants. (Appeal No. 2.)

COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, CAMILLUS (JAMES GASCON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. JOHN A. MAYA, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.


COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, CAMILLUS (JAMES GASCON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS.

JOHN A. MAYA, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Kelsey v. Hourigan ( [appeal No. 1]—AD3d—[Aug. 22, 2019] [4th Dept 2019] ).


Summaries of

Kelsey v. Hourigan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Kelsey v. Hourigan

Case Details

Full title:John A. KELSEY and Mary M. Kelsey, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Gerald E…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
105 N.Y.S.3d 347