Kelsey v. Hourigan

Full title: JOHN A. KELSEY AND MARY M. KELSEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. GERALD E…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 6259 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

473 CA 18-01954

08-22-2019

JOHN A. KELSEY AND MARY M. KELSEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. GERALD E. HOURIGAN, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND DOING BUSINESS AS GERALD HOURIGAN DAIRY FARM, PATRICIA J. HOURIGAN, GERALD E. HOURIGAN, JR., AND PATRICIA J. HOURIGAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS HOURIGAN'S UDDER PLACE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, CAMILLUS (JAMES GASCON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. JOHN A. MAYA, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

PRESENT:

COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, CAMILLUS (JAMES GASCON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

JOHN A. MAYA, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered October 11, 2018. The order denied defendants' motion for leave to renew and reargue their motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Kelsey v Hourigan ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Aug. 22, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).

Entered: August 22, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court