From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 4, 2021
336 Conn. 941 (Conn. 2021)

Opinion

05-04-2021

Eric T. KELSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Naomi T. Fetterman, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Naomi T. Fetterman, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Eric T. Kelsey's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 202 Conn. App. 21, 244 A.3d 171, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that ‘abuse of discretion' is the appropriate standard of review of a habeas court's dismissal of a successive habeas petition following its determination that the petitioner had not demonstrated good cause for the untimely filing pursuant to General Statutes § 52-470 ?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the habeas court did not err in finding that the petitioner had failed to establish good cause necessary to overcome the rebuttable presumption of unreasonable delay as set forth in § 52-470 ?"


Summaries of

Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 4, 2021
336 Conn. 941 (Conn. 2021)
Case details for

Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Eric T. KELSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 4, 2021

Citations

336 Conn. 941 (Conn. 2021)
250 A.3d 41

Citing Cases

Ortiz v. Comm'r of Corr.

(Emphasis added.) Kelsey v. Commissioner of Correction , 202 Conn. App. 21, 34, 244 A.3d 171 (2020), cert.…

Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.

And (2) "Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the habeas court did not err in finding that the…