From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 26, 2021
336 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2021)

Opinion

01-26-2021

Eric T. KELSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Naomi T. Fetterman, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Naomi T. Fetterman, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Eric T. Kelsey's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 202 Conn. App. 21, 244 A.3d 171, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that ‘abuse of discretion’ is the appropriate standard of review for dismissals of habeas petitions pursuant to General Statutes § 52-470 ?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the petitioner had failed to establish good cause necessary to overcome the rebuttable presumption of unreasonable delay as set forth in § 52-470 ?"


Summaries of

Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 26, 2021
336 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2021)
Case details for

Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Eric T. KELSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 26, 2021

Citations

336 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2021)
336 Conn. 912

Citing Cases

Velez v. Comm'r of Corr.

Ultimately, the court concluded that "the petitioner has failed to prove how his deficits affected his…

Stenner v. Comm'r of Corr.

Specifically, our Supreme Court granted certification to decide the appropriate standard of review for…