From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelsall v. Haisten

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Feb 13, 2018
Cause number: 01-17-00389-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2018)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-17-00389-CV

02-13-2018

Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten


ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Opposed Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee's Brief Party filing motion: Appellee's counsel Denice Smith Document to be filed: Appellee's Brief Is appeal accelerated? No. If motion to extend time:

Original due date: November 22, 2017

Number of extensions granted: 2

Current Due Date: January 22, 2018

Date Requested: February 21, 2018 (91 days from original due date)
Ordered that motion is:
[v] Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: February 21, 2018.

[v] No further extensions of time will be granted.

[ ] Denied

[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

[v] Other: ____________________
Because appellee's counsel's third extension provides extraordinary reasons for needing more time to file her brief, this extension is granted until February 21, 2018, but no further extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d).
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: February 13, 2018 November 7, 2008 Revision


Summaries of

Kelsall v. Haisten

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Feb 13, 2018
Cause number: 01-17-00389-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Kelsall v. Haisten

Case Details

Full title:Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Feb 13, 2018

Citations

Cause number: 01-17-00389-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2018)