From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelmar v. Capital One Mortgage

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 20, 2007
Case No. C 07 1803 RMW PVT (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. C 07 1803 RMW PVT.

June 20, 2007

Abraham J. Colman (SBN 146933), Deborah E. Yim (SBN 217400), Kristine H. Chen (SBN 239925), REED SMITH LLP, Los Angeles, CA., Attorneys for Defendant, Capital One Bank, erroneously sued as Capital One Mortgage.


ORDER


Pursuant to Defendant Capital One Bank, erroneously sued as Capital One Mortgage's ("Capital One") Request for Continuance of its Motion to Compel Arbitration or Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration (the "Motion") and for good cause shown,

1. The June 29, 2007 hearing date on Capital One's Motion is hereby continued to July 13, 2007.

2. Capital One's reply brief is due according to this new hearing date pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 7-3(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kelmar v. Capital One Mortgage

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 20, 2007
Case No. C 07 1803 RMW PVT (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Kelmar v. Capital One Mortgage

Case Details

Full title:CHERYL KELMAR, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE MORTGAGE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 20, 2007

Citations

Case No. C 07 1803 RMW PVT (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2007)