From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 17, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-64-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 17, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-64-JJB-RLB

09-17-2014

MICHAEL A. KELLY (#100147) v. RAMAN SINGH, M.D., ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr., dated July 22, 2014 (doc. no. 7). The plaintiff filed an objection which merely restates his prior argument and has been duly considered.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, as a result of the plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies as mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, but with prejudice to the refiling of the same claim or claims in forma pauperis. Further, the plaintiff's pending motions for leave to amend his Complaint (doc. no. 5 and 6) are DENIED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 17, 2014.

/s/_________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Kelly v. Singh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 17, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-64-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Kelly v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. KELLY (#100147) v. RAMAN SINGH, M.D., ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 17, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-64-JJB-RLB (M.D. La. Sep. 17, 2014)

Citing Cases

Kleinpeter v. Kilbourne

22 La. ADC, Part I, §§ 325(G)(1) and 325(I)(1)(a)(ii)(I).Kelly v. Singh, No. 14-64, 2014 WL 4660854, at *2…