From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. New York Telephone Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1984
100 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

March 12, 1984


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered September 9, 1983, which denied his motion to sever the third-party action and to dismiss the third-party complaint. ¶ Order reversed, on the law, with costs, motion granted, third-party action severed and third-party complaint dismissed. ¶ Respondent has no cause of action against appellant. Plaintiff in the main action has released appellant in exchange for substantial consideration. Therefore, as a settling tort-feasor with no potential liability for contribution, appellant is entitled to dismissal of the third-party complaint (see General Obligations Law, § 15-108, subd [b]; see, also, Lettiere v Martin Elevator Co., 62 A.D.2d 810, aff'd. 48 N.Y.2d 662; Mitchell v New York Hosp., 93 A.D.2d 832, mod on other grounds 61 N.Y.2d 208; Mielcarek v Knights, 50 A.D.2d 122). Niehoff, J.P., Rubin, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kelly v. New York Telephone Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 12, 1984
100 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Kelly v. New York Telephone Company

Case Details

Full title:JEANNE KELLY, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1984

Citations

100 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Woolworth Co. v. Southbridge

The law is clear that where the plaintiff (that is, the injured party) has released a tort-feasor from…

Suin v. One Graham LLC

After a considerably amount of litigation, on July 2, 2020, the parties amicably resolved the main action,…