From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. Gyorkey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 6, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2142 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2142 EFB P

06-06-2012

JAMES CARL KELLY, Plaintiff, v. F. GYORKEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 13, 2012, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a cognizable claim and for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The dismissal order explained the complaint's deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. On April 19, 2012, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file his amended complaint.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case.

Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

_________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Kelly v. Gyorkey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 6, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2142 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Kelly v. Gyorkey

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CARL KELLY, Plaintiff, v. F. GYORKEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2142 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

Kelly v. SAO

Plaintiff is subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which provides that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a…

Kelly v. Newsome

. 1. Kelly v. Gyorkey, No. 2:11-cv-02142-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to prosecute and…