From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03193

Argued April 11, 2003.

May 12, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Bancker Construction appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated February 19, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Tromello, McDonnell Kehoe, Melville, N.Y. (James S. Kehoe of counsel), for appellant.

Decolator, Cohen Di Prisco, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (John V. Decolator of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Bancker Construction failed to demonstrate its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion for summary judgment.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, McGINITY and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kelly v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 2003
305 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Kelly v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL KELLY, ET AL., respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 338