From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 10, 1937
276 N.W. 274 (Minn. 1937)

Opinion

No. 31,291.

December 10, 1937.

Appeal and error — order not appealable.

Order examined and held not appealable.

Action for conversion in the district court for Hennepin county wherein plaintiff had a verdict. Defendants' motion for a new trial was granted, William C. Leary, Judge, and plaintiff appealed from the order. Appeal dismissed.

S.S. Smith and William E. MacGregor, for appellant.

Fagerstrom Jaroscak, for respondents Frank W. Bowman and William J. Allison.

Safford, Putnam, Campbell Leavitt, James E. O'Brien, and Arthur P. Jensen, for respondents Charles I. Tenney, DeWitt C. Tenney, and Continental Public Utilities Corporation.



Appeal from an order granting a new trial upon defendants' motion after verdict in favor of plaintiff. Memoranda attached to and made part of the order recite that it was granted exclusively for errors of law occurring at the trial, upon the grounds (1) that there was no evidence to justify a finding that the defendants or any of them converted the stock claimed to have been converted; (2) that if the stock was converted the evidence did not show that the defendants were liable therefor because the conversion was by others; (3) that the proof of damages was speculative and did not establish the damages found by the jury. These are not errors of law occurring at the trial. The order is not appealable, and the appeal is dismissed upon the authority of Roelofs v. Baber, 194 Minn. 166, 259 N.W. 808, and Olson v. Heise, 197 Minn. 441, 267 N.W. 425.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Kelly v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 10, 1937
276 N.W. 274 (Minn. 1937)
Case details for

Kelly v. Bowman

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS R. KELLY v. FRANK W. BOWMAN AND OTHERS

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 10, 1937

Citations

276 N.W. 274 (Minn. 1937)
276 N.W. 274

Citing Cases

Von Bank v. Mayer

We have held in a number of cases that "In order to render the order granting a new trial appealable, the…

Voller v. Schmitz

"* * * In order to render the order granting a new trial appealable, the order or the memorandum must…