From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kellond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 3, 2021
333 So. 3d 244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2328

11-03-2021

Daniel KELLOND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Daniel Kellond, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Daniel Kellond, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

B.L. Thomas, Roberts, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kellond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 3, 2021
333 So. 3d 244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Kellond v. State

Case Details

Full title:Daniel KELLOND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

333 So. 3d 244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)