From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelley v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 3, 2014
151 So. 3d 1226 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC13–2255.

2014-09-3

William H. KELLEY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


William Harold Kelley's Petition for Review of Order Rendered October 31, 2013, and for the Exercise of Court's All Writs Power is hereby denied. After conducting in camera reviews of the documents, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Kelley access to sealed records submitted by the State Attorney's Office. See Parker v. State, 904 So.2d 370, 379 (Fla.2005) (“The trial court reviewed these records and determined that they did not contain any Brady material. Thus, the record reveals that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Parker access to sealed records submitted by the State Attorney's Office.”). Additionally, “[t]he all writs provision of section 3(b)(7) does not confer added appellate jurisdiction on this Court, and this Court's all writs power cannot be used as an independent basis of jurisdiction.” St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304, 1305 (Fla.1980). LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

QUINCE, J., recused.


Summaries of

Kelley v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Sep 3, 2014
151 So. 3d 1226 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Kelley v. State

Case Details

Full title:William H. KELLEY, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Sep 3, 2014

Citations

151 So. 3d 1226 (Fla. 2014)