From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keller v. Stevens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jul 22, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-2467-JTM-TJJ (D. Kan. Jul. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-2467-JTM-TJJ

07-22-2016

ERIC DAVID KELLER, Plaintiff, v. RICK STEVENS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge James on July 5, 2016 (Dkt. 5). Judge James recommended the undersigned dismiss the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) because: 1) plaintiff's factual allegations are insufficient to raise a right to relief above the speculative level; and 2) no facts alleged would support the District of Kansas having jurisdiction over defendant. Id. at 3. Despite Judge James's admonition regarding the consequences of failing to do so, plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation to date, and the time for doing so has expired. For good cause shown and pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 72.1.4, the court adopts the Report and Recommendation and dismisses the present action.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge James's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5) is accepted, adopted, and affirmed. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of July 2016.

s/ J. Thomas Marten

J. THOMAS MARTEN, Judge


Summaries of

Keller v. Stevens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jul 22, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-2467-JTM-TJJ (D. Kan. Jul. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Keller v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DAVID KELLER, Plaintiff, v. RICK STEVENS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jul 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-2467-JTM-TJJ (D. Kan. Jul. 22, 2016)