From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keller v. Monroe County Police Dept

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2519 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2519 MCE CKD PS.

September 27, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

In this case, it appears that a substantial part of the events giving rise to plaintiff's claims occurred in Monroe County, Indiana, which is in the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Therefore, plaintiff's claim should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a);Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division.


Summaries of

Keller v. Monroe County Police Dept

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2519 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Keller v. Monroe County Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL KELLER, Plaintiff, v. MONROE COUNTY POLICE DEPT., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2519 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)