Kelleher v. Kelleher

8 Citing cases

  1. Jafari v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

    CASE NO. 12cv2982-LAB (RBB) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2015)   Cited 1 times

    A claim based on unjust enrichment requires "receipt of a benefit and the unjust retention of the benefit at the expense of another." Kelleher v. Kelleher, 2014 WL 94197, at *7 (N.D. Cal. 2014) (quotation omitted). The plaintiff must have suffered the injury to maintain an unjust enrichment claim.

  2. Oracle Am., Inc. v. Appleby

    Case No. 16-cv-02090-JST (N.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2016)   Cited 2 times

    "Because a claim for actual fraudulent transfer involves an allegation of fraud or mistake, it is subject to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), which requires a party to 'state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake' and is applied by a federal court to both federal law and state law claims." Kelleher v. Kelleher, No. 13-CV-05450-MEJ, 2014 WL 94197, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2014). "Thus, Plaintiff's Complaint must plead with particularity the circumstances surrounding the fraud or mistake."

  3. LaChapelle v. Kim

    Case No. 15-cv-02195-JSC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2015)   Cited 3 times

    Indeed, courts in this District regularly hold that Rule 9(b) applies to a fraudulent conveyance claim alleging intent to hinder, delay, or defraud.See, e.g., Opperman v. Path, Inc., --- F. Supp. 3d ----, No. 13-cv-00453--JST, 2014 WL 1973378, at *31 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2014); Kelleher v. Kelleher, No. 13-cv-05450-MEJ, 2014 WL 94197, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2014) ("Because a claim for actual fraudulent transfer involves an allegation of fraud or mistake, it is subject to [Rule] 9(b), which requires a party to 'state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake' and is applied by a federal court to both federal law and state law claims.")

  4. Airbus DS Optronics GmbH v. Nivisys LLC

    No. CV-14-02399-PHX-JAT (D. Ariz. May. 28, 2015)   Cited 10 times
    Discussing the standard governing ยง 1404 motions (quoting Sleepy Lagoon, Ltd. v. Tower Grp., Inc., 809 F. Supp. 2d 1300, 1306 (N.D.Okla.2011))

    See In re Tronox Inc., 429 B.R. 73, 96 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 2010) (collecting cases concluding Rule9(b) does not apply to claims of constructive fraudulent conveyance); In re Air Cargo, Inc., 401 B.R. 178, 192 (Bankr.D.Md.2008) (noting that while courts are divided on the question whether Rule 9(b) applies to constructive fraudulent conveyance claims, the majority have concluded it does not); Van-Am. Ins. Co. v. Schiappa, et al., 191 F.R.D. 537, 542-43 (S.D.Ohio 2000) (applying Rule 9(b) to claims of actual fraudulent transfer but not to claims of constructive fraudulent transfer; Kelleher v. Kelleher, 2014 WL 94197, at *6 (N.D.Cal.2014); Hyosung (Am.), Inc. v. Hantle USA, Inc., 2011 WL 835781, at *4 (N.D.Cal. March 4, 2011); Sunnyside Dev. Co. LLC v. Cambridge Display Tech. Ltd., 2008 WL 4450328, at *9 (N.D.Cal.2008). The court agrees with the reasoning of these courts and concludes that Rule 9 applies to a claim of actual fraudulent transfer under Nevada law but not to a claim of constructive fraudulent transfer.

  5. Takiguchi v. MRI Int'l, Inc.

    2:13-cv-01183-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 10, 2015)   Cited 3 times

    S.D.N.Y. 2010) (collecting cases concluding Rule 9(b) does not apply to claims of constructive fraudulent conveyance); In re Air Cargo, Inc., 401 B.R. 178, 192 (Bankr. D. Md. 2008) (noting that while courts are divided on the question whether Rule 9(b) applies to constructive fraudulent conveyance claims, the majority have concluded it does not); Van-Am. Ins. Co. v. Schiappa, et al., 191 F.R.D. 537, 542-43 (S.D. Ohio 2000) (applying Rule 9(b) to claims of actual fraudulent transfer but not to claims of constructive fraudulent transfer; Kelleher v. Kelleher, 2014 WL 94197, at *6 (N.D. Cal. 2014); Hyosung (Am.), Inc. v. Hantle USA, Inc., 2011 WL 835781, at *4 (N.D. Cal. March 4, 2011); Sunnyside Dev. Co. LLC v. Cambridge Display Tech. Ltd., 2008 WL 4450328, at *9 (N.D. Cal. 2008). The court agrees with the reasoning of these courts and concludes that Rule 9 applies to a claim of actual fraudulent transfer under Nevada law but not to a claim of constructive fraudulent transfer.

  6. Bond Safeguard Insurance Co. v. Kramer

    2:14-cv-01896-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2015)

    Rule 9(b) applies to section 3439.04 but not to section 3439.05. See Kelleher v. Kelleher, 2014 WL 94197, at *5-*6 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2014); Sunnyside Dev. Co. LLC v. Cambridge Display Tech. Ltd., 2008 WL 4450328, at *6, *8, *9 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2008). Thus, to the extent the allegations support a claim under section 3439.04, the Court applies Rule 9(b).

  7. Bond Safeguard Insurance Co. v. Kramer

    No. 2:14-cv-01896-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)

    Rule 9(b) applies to section 3439.04 but not to section 3439.05. See Kelleher v. Kelleher, 2014 WL 94197, at *5-*6 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2014); Sunnyside Dev.Co. LLC v. Cambridge Display Tech. Ltd., 2008 WL 4450328, at *6, *8, *9 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 29, 2008). Thus, to the extent the allegations support a claim under section 3439.04, the Court applies Rule 9(b).

  8. Aqua-Chem, Inc. v. Marine Sys., Inc.

    CASE NO. C13-2208JLR (W.D. Wash. Feb. 27, 2014)   Cited 1 times

    This standard applies to fraudulent transfer actions and to cases originally filed in state court. See, e.g., Kelleher v. Kelleher, No. 13-cv-05450-MEJ, 2014 WL 94197, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2014); Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c); Baricevic, 2014 WL 291091, at *1. Aqua-Chem's complaint satisfies Rule 9(b).