From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kellar v. Prudential Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 3, 1969
32 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

April 3, 1969

Appeal from the Erie Trial Term.

Present — Del Vecchio, J.P., Marsh, Witmer, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment granted to plaintiff, with costs. Memorandum: The proof discloses (albeit to a great extent by respondents' "offers of counsel") that the assignments of the policies of insurance to respondents' testatrix were conditional and to be discharged upon demand by the insured, which demand had been properly made, and refused. Respondents produced no witness or other evidence. Upon this state of the record, the burden of showing anything other than a conditional assignment was cast upon respondents, a burden which they clearly failed to sustain. All concur, Moule, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Kellar v. Prudential Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 3, 1969
32 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Kellar v. Prudential Insurance

Case Details

Full title:EMILICENT M. KELLAR, as Executrix of ALEXANDER MULKI, Deceased, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
298 N.Y.S.2d 1012