From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kellam v. Trail

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Apr 29, 1916
185 S.W. 988 (Tex. Civ. App. 1916)

Opinion

No. 7527.

April 29, 1916.

Error from Kaufman County Court; James A. Cooley, Judge.

Action by John F. Trail against H. C. Kellam and others. Judgment against defendants, and defendant Kellam brings error. Reversed and remanded.

Huffmaster Huffmaster, of Kaufman, for plaintiff in error.


This suit was instituted by defendant in error in the county court of Kaufman county, to recover on a promissory note against A. G., W. C., and H. C. Kellam and T. E. Wilson. A. G. Kellam waived service, and T. E. Wilson answered. Judgment was entered for plaintitff against all the defendants. W. C. and H. C. Kellam not having appeared, judgment by default was rendered against them. Execution was issued and levied on property of H. C. Kellam, who sued out this writ of error, filing a supersedeas bond, and the cause is here for review.

The complaint of plaintiff in error, in effect, is that no proper service of citation was had upon him, and, he not having answered, the court erred in rendering judgment against him. The return of the officer serving said citation is:

"Came to hand on the 20th day of February, A.D. 1914, at 10 o'clock a. m. and executed on the 5th day of March, 1914, at ________ o'clock p. m. by delivering to W. C. Kellam and H. C. Kellam, two of the within named defendants, in person a true copy of this writ."

This return is fatally defective in failing to show that each of the two Kellams was served with copies of the citation, and was not such as to authorize a judgment against them by default. King v. Goodson, 42 Tex. 152; Holliday v. Steele, 65 Tex. 388; Russell v. Butler, 71 S.W. 395.

The judgment is reversed, and cause remanded.


Summaries of

Kellam v. Trail

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Apr 29, 1916
185 S.W. 988 (Tex. Civ. App. 1916)
Case details for

Kellam v. Trail

Case Details

Full title:KELLAM v. TRAIL

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas

Date published: Apr 29, 1916

Citations

185 S.W. 988 (Tex. Civ. App. 1916)

Citing Cases

Lipscomb v. Wood County

Counsel for plaintiff in error insists that the return does not show that G. W. Lipscomb was served in person…

Home Ben. Ass'n v. Sims

Returns made by officers on citation in almost the identical language with the one at bar, have been by our…