From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelkenberg v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 14, 1997.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Supreme Court properly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff asserted that the parties entered into a joint venture regarding the purchase of lottery tickets and that he is entitled to share in the $10 million lottery jackpot won by defendants on April 8, 1995. Defendants established that the parties never intended to form a joint venture and plaintiff did not contribute any money to the lottery pot for the purchase of the April 8, 1995 lottery tickets. Plaintiff's assertions that employees reimbursed one another for contributions to the lottery pot from time to time does not controvert the fact that plaintiff did not participate in the relevant pool and does not raise a question of fact regarding the existence of a joint venture ( see, Village of Wellsville v Village of Andover, 231 AD2d 870). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Kelkenberg v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Kelkenberg v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL KELKENBERG, Appellant, v. JOHN T. ANDERSON et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
654 N.Y.S.2d 551

Citing Cases

Parker v. Parker

Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the June 1987 agreement, the winnings are, prima facie, the wife's…

Parker v. Parker

The lottery proceeds herein are not subject to equitable distribution unless the husband first successfully…