From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keitel v. D'Agostino

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 7, 2022
1:21-cv-08537-JMF (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-08537-JMF

03-07-2022

FREDERICK J. KEITEL, III, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THOMAS B. D'AGOSTINO, SR., et al., Defendants.

Spencer B. Robbins NYSBR: 1740158 Robbins & Robbins, LLP for Plaintiffs, FJK IV Properties, Inc.; FJK Properties, Inc.; FJK III Properties, Inc; Florida Capital Management, LLC Frederick J. Keitel, III, pro se


Spencer B. Robbins

NYSBR: 1740158

Robbins & Robbins, LLP

for Plaintiffs, FJK IV Properties, Inc.;

FJK Properties, Inc.; FJK III Properties, Inc;

Florida Capital Management, LLC

Frederick J. Keitel, III, pro se

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RESCHEDULE MARCH 9, 2022 HEARING

Plaintiffs through undersigned counsel, respectfully requests this Court to Reschedule the hearing set by Court Order for March 9, 2022 for the following reasons:

1. On February 3, 2022, the Court issued Order, ECF 35, for an in person conference with the Court for Wednesday March 9, 2022 at 11:00 AM.

2. The Order is for both parties to appear “for an in-person conference with the court” to address the Plaintiffs' motion for extension of deadline to effectuate service ECF No.34, as well as FJK Entities' motion to terminate Spencer Robbins as counsel, ECF No. 7.

3. Mr. Robbins is in Europe on a prepaid vacation with his family, and unavailable to appear, until March 14, 2022.

4. Plaintiffs' request that the court reschedule the hearing to the pretrial conference set for March 24, 2022 at 4:00 PM, or reschedule the hearing to March 15-18, 2022.

5. Plaintiffs' also request that the court extend the date to effect service until the hearing date, or the March 24, 2022 pretrial hearing.

6. Plaintiffs also request the court to not grant any requests for an extension of time for defendants to file their answer to the complaint, since they have had notice and service via mail and email for months, even if all defendants have not been personally served, due to their own actions or actions of counsel to evade the Summons issued by the Clerk of the U.S. District Court, Southern District New York .

6. This motion is filed for good cause, in good faith, not for delay, but due to Plaintiffs' counsel, Mr. Robbins unavailability.

7. Plaintiffs are emailing all counsel for their agreement, and/or objections, but doesn't expect defendants' lawyers, almost all named defendants in this case to cooperate.

WHEREFORE Plaintiffs having shown good cause requests this court to (1) reschedule the hearing to the pretrial conference set for March 24, 2022 at 4:00 PM, (2) schedule the hearing for the any day on March 15-18, 2022 (3) extend the date to effect service of the complaint until the hearing and (4) for any relief this courts deems appropriate.


Summaries of

Keitel v. D'Agostino

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 7, 2022
1:21-cv-08537-JMF (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Keitel v. D'Agostino

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK J. KEITEL, III, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THOMAS B. D'AGOSTINO…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 7, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-08537-JMF (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2022)