From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keingarsky v. Keingarsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1988
145 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

December 19, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The record demonstrates that the plaintiff disobeyed court orders directing her to answer the defendant's interrogatories. Under the circumstances, the imposition of sanctions upon the plaintiff, in the form of attorney's fees, was proper (see, CPLR 3126; Minnick v Minnick, 109 A.D.2d 871; Gabrelian v Gabrelian, 108 A.D.2d 445, 448, appeal dismissed 66 N.Y.2d 741; 3A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶¶ 3126.06, 3126.14; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3126:11, at 653-654). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Keingarsky v. Keingarsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1988
145 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Keingarsky v. Keingarsky

Case Details

Full title:LOIS KEINGARSKY, Appellant, v. NATHAN KEINGARSKY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1988

Citations

145 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Oi Tai Chan v. Society of Shaolin Temple, Inc.

The appointment of Jeffrey Kim, Esq. is made at the expense of Mr. Jiang personally. Imposition of…

Morgenstern v. Jeffsam Corp.

Therefore, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in dismissing the complaint.…