Opinion
Argued December 13, 1916
Decided December 28, 1916
Daniel C. Meegan for appellant.
Homer J. Borst for respondent.
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Keiley v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1916
115 N.E. 1042 (N.Y. 1916)
Summaries of
Keiley v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1916
115 N.E. 1042 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for
Keiley v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Case Details
Full title:TIMOTHY KEILEY, as Administrator of the Estate of HAROLD J. KEILEY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 28, 1916
Citations
115 N.E. 1042 (N.Y. 1916)
115 N.E. 1042