From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keeton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 17, 1954
264 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. Crim. App. 1954)

Opinion

No. 26833.

February 17, 1954.

Appeal from the District Court, Johnson County, Penn J. Jackson, J.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


This is a conviction for selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, thirty days in jail.

The information charges only that appellant did, in a dry area, 'sell whiskey.'

The name of the alleged purchaser is not stated, nor is there an allegation that the purchaser was unknown.

Such an information is fatally defective. Barnett v. State, 156 Tex.Crim. R., 242 S.W.2d 885 ; Wilson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 242 S.W.2d 886; Arts. 406 and 416, C.C.P.

The information being fatally defective, a conviction may not be predicated thereon.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.


Summaries of

Keeton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 17, 1954
264 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. Crim. App. 1954)
Case details for

Keeton v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEETON v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 17, 1954

Citations

264 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. Crim. App. 1954)
159 Tex. Crim. 431

Citing Cases

Treadgill v. State

Art. 406, C.C.P., requires that in prosecutions for an unlawful sale the state's pleading must name the…

Laury v. State

Since the name of the purchaser is not alleged, the information is fatally defective. Barnett v. State,…