From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keeton v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 13, 2018
NO. CV 17-1213-FMO (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2018)

Opinion

NO. CV 17-1213-FMO (KS)

09-13-2018

TOMMY ROY KEETON, Plaintiff, v. G. MARSHALL, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint (the "Complaint"), Defendants' Motion For Order Revoking Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status (the "Motion"), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) the Motion is GRANTED;

(2) the Order granting Plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of filing fees (Dkt. No. 4) is VACATED; and

(2) the Complaint shall be DISMISSED without prejudice as to all defendants and claims unless, within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff pays the full required filing fee of $400.00. DATED: September 13, 2018

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Keeton v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 13, 2018
NO. CV 17-1213-FMO (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Keeton v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY ROY KEETON, Plaintiff, v. G. MARSHALL, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 13, 2018

Citations

NO. CV 17-1213-FMO (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2018)

Citing Cases

Keeton v. Lynch

ECF No. 9 is plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because plaintiff has been…