From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KEETON v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 27, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P.

January 27, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 20, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 20, 2010, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant Ramirez's motion to dismiss (#34) is denied; and

3. Defendant Ramirez shall file his answer within twenty-one days.

Dated: January 26, 2011


Summaries of

KEETON v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 27, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2011)
Case details for

KEETON v. COX

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY ROY KEETON, Plaintiff, v. COX, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 27, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2011)