From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KEETON v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 10, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P.

May 10, 2011


ORDER


On May 2, 2011, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's April 20, 2011 order denying plaintiff's request to extend the deadline for propounding discovery requests. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 20, 2011, is affirmed.


Summaries of

KEETON v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 10, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)
Case details for

KEETON v. COX

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY ROY KEETON, Plaintiff, v. COX, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)