From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KEETON v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P.

April 20, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting permission to propound certain discovery requests. However, plaintiff does not need a court order to engage in discovery. Therefore, his motion (#50) is denied. To the extent plaintiff seeks an extension of the March 14, 2011 deadline for serving discovery requests, plaintiff's request is denied as he has not shown why his requests for discovery were not served before expiration of the deadline.

DATED: April 19, 2011


Summaries of

KEETON v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2011
No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)
Case details for

KEETON v. COX

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY ROY KEETON, Plaintiff, v. COX, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)