From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KEETON v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2011
No. 2:06-cv-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P.

February 10, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's February 1, 2011 request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: February 9, 2011.


Summaries of

KEETON v. COX

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2011
No. 2:06-cv-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011)
Case details for

KEETON v. COX

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY ROY KEETON, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT COX, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2011

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-1094 GEB JFM (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011)