Keeper Sec. v. Keeper Tax Inc.

Full title: KEEPER SECURITY, INC., Plaintiff, v. KEEPER TAX INC., Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Date published: Oct 29, 2024

1:23-cv-01043 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-01043

10-29-2024

KEEPER SECURITY, INC., Plaintiff, v. KEEPER TAX INC., Defendant.

DEAN D. NIRO NICHOLAS NIRO VITALE, VICKREY, NIRO, SOLON & GASEY LLP ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF KEEPER SECURITY, INC.

HON. LASHONDA A. HUNT JUDGE

MARIA VALDEZ MAG. JUDGE

DEAN D. NIRO NICHOLAS NIRO VITALE, VICKREY, NIRO, SOLON & GASEY LLP ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF KEEPER SECURITY, INC.

PLAINTIFF KEEPER SECURITY INC.'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 50(b)

HON. LASHONDA A. HUNT JUDGE

Plaintiff, Keeper Security, Inc. (“Keeper” or “Plaintiff”), hereby moves pursuant to U.S.C. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 50(b) for judgment as a matter of law. Based on the overwhelming unrebutted evidence presented by Plaintiff, no rational juror could have found for the Defendant Keeper Tax, Inc. (“Keeper Tax” or “Defendant”) on the issue of trademark infringement. Campbell v. Miller, 499 F.3d 711, 719 (7th Cir. 2007). Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the jury verdict reached in this case. In the alternative, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant a new trial.