From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KEEN v. JOHNSON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1898
29 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

May Term, 1898.

Present — Barrett, Rumsey, O'Brien and McLaughlin, JJ.


Order, so far as it grants motion to strike cause from Special Term calendar affirmed. So much of order as grants leave to either party to make further application, stricken out. No costs to either party of this appeal.


The order, so far as it directs that this cause should be stricken from the Special Term calendar was proper. The action should be tried at a Trial Term of the court, where it properly belongs. So much of the order, therefore, as grants the motion to strike the cause from the Special Term calendar, with costs, should be affirmed. But the court below, having all the facts before it, should not have provided for a further application as to the mode of trial. So much of the order, therefore, as grants leave to either party to apply as he may be advised for an order directing the mode of trial of issues in the action should be stricken out. No costs to either party of this appeal.


Summaries of

KEEN v. JOHNSON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1898
29 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

KEEN v. JOHNSON

Case Details

Full title:Charles B. Keen and William Y. Carver, Appellants, v. Charles A. Johnson…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1898

Citations

29 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)