From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Feb 25, 2003
99 S.W.3d 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81259

February 25, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Joan M. Burger, Judge.

Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Nicole E. Gorovsky, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, C.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Robert E. Crist, Sr. J.



ORDER


Cedric Keel ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims his counsel was ineffective. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court's determination that movant's claims are refuted by the record is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Keel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Feb 25, 2003
99 S.W.3d 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Keel v. State

Case Details

Full title:CEDRIC KEEL, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Feb 25, 2003

Citations

99 S.W.3d 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)