From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keel v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-2796 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-2796 JAM DAD (PC)

03-20-2012

RICKY RAY KEEL, Plaintiff, v. D. BAKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 13, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 13, 2012, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' June 16, 2011 motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 29) is denied; and

3. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Keel v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-2796 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Keel v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:RICKY RAY KEEL, Plaintiff, v. D. BAKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-2796 JAM DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)