From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keegan v. Southland Waste Systems

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 11, 2006
925 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D05-1336.

April 11, 2006.

Daniel J. Glary, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

David R. Drill of Kelley, Kronenberg, Gilmartin, Fichtel Wander, Jacksonville, for Appellees.


Appellant seeks reversal of the JCC's order denying his workers' compensation claim. Appellant alleges that the JCC erred by failing to appoint an expert medical advisor (EMA) on his motion for such appointment based upon the presence of conflicting medical testimony on a material issue; Appellees allege in opposition that no conflicting testimony exists on a material issue and Appellant's motion was untimely. We agree with Appellant because there is a conflict between the expert testimony of Drs. Shah and Solloway on a material issue, the JCC should have appointed an EMA, and under the circumstances of this case Appellant's motion was timely.

Therefore, we REVERSE and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Keegan v. Southland Waste Systems

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 11, 2006
925 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Keegan v. Southland Waste Systems

Case Details

Full title:Joseph C. KEEGAN, Appellant, v. SOUTHLAND WASTE SYSTEMS and Liberty Mutual…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 11, 2006

Citations

925 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)