Opinion
May, 1920.
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that, on the facts, the court could not say, as matter of law, that plaintiff had assumed the risk of driving the owner's horse, in view of the foreman's direction to drive him once more, which he promised should be the last time. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concur.