From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1924
209 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

June, 1924.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Smith, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.


Since the question of the authorized representative of the true Russian church is in such doubt under these papers, we deem it best to allow the matter to be settled after a trial of the issues. The order denying the motion for a temporary injunction should, therefore, be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the order confirming the referee's report should be affirmed, without costs.


On the first appeal: Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. On the second appeal: Order affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1924
209 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky

Case Details

Full title:JOHN S. KEDROVSKY, as Delegate of the HOLY SYNOD OF THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1924

Citations

209 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)