From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kebab Gyros, Inc. v. Riyad

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Apr 20, 2011
Case No. 3:09-0061 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-0061.

April 20, 2011


ORDER


For the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, defendant Samuel Riyad's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 143) is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affidavits of Medhat Khalil and Milad Riyad (Docket No. 164) is DENIED. The plaintiff's claims in this case are DISMISSED. Samuel Riyad still has counterclaims pending under antitrust law and challenging the validity of the mark at issue in this case. (Docket No. 33.) If, despite his success here, Riyad still wishes to pursue these claims, he should file notice with the court so stating within 20 days of this Order. Otherwise, the court will close the file and dismiss this case in its entirety.

It is so ordered.

Enter this 19th day of April 2011.


Summaries of

Kebab Gyros, Inc. v. Riyad

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Apr 20, 2011
Case No. 3:09-0061 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Kebab Gyros, Inc. v. Riyad

Case Details

Full title:KEBAB GYROS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL RIYAD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Apr 20, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:09-0061 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 20, 2011)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Weinstein Co.

Here, the Marks (assuming they even qualify as trademarks) are extremely weak. Particularly as concerns the…

Clever Factory, Inc. v. Kingsbridge Int'l, Inc.

2008); McDonald's Corp. v. Shop at Home, Inc., 82 F.Supp.2d 801, 816 (M.D.Tenn. 2000); Kebab Gyros, Inc. v.…