From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keane v. Tomsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 22, 2002
290 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

12

January 22, 2002

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered on or about November 9, 2000, which denied defendants-appellants' motion to dismiss the complaint as against them pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs

SYLVAIN R. JAKABOVICS, for Plaintiff-Respondent,

WENDY BETH SHEPPS and STEWART M. CASPER, for Defendants-Appellants,

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman, Marlow, JJ


Appellants' motion to dismiss was properly denied since the documentary evidence upon which the motion is premised does not establish, as a matter of law, that defendants, plaintiff's attorneys in the underlying action, did not commit actionable malpractice in connection with serving the defendants in that action (see, Ladenburg Thalmann Co., Inc. v. Tim's Amusements, Inc., 275 A.D.2d 243, 246)

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT


Summaries of

Keane v. Tomsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 22, 2002
290 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Keane v. Tomsky

Case Details

Full title:MARY-JO KEANE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN M.TOMSKY, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 22, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 221