From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kealohapauole v. Itoe

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 5, 2024
No. 21-12237 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 5, 2024)

Opinion

21-12237

03-05-2024

CLEVELAND KEALOHAPAUOLE, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ITOE, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On February 12, 2024, Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr., issued a report and recommendation proposing that the court dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a)(1), because Plaintiff is deceased and his estate or other appropriate party has not substituted in his place. No timely objections have been filed.

With respect to reports and recommendations from magistrate judges, this court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court “may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” Id.

Upon review of the report and recommendation, and having received no objection, the court agrees with Magistrate Judge Ivy's analysis and conclusions.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ivy's report and recommendation (ECF No. 39) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the order of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a)(1).


Summaries of

Kealohapauole v. Itoe

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 5, 2024
No. 21-12237 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Kealohapauole v. Itoe

Case Details

Full title:CLEVELAND KEALOHAPAUOLE, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ITOE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 5, 2024

Citations

No. 21-12237 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 5, 2024)