From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaziu v. Celluzziele LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06028

Argued March 10, 2003.

March 31, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), entered June 5, 2002, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Lipsig Shapey Manus Moverman, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac De Cicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for appellant.

Bruce A. Lawrence, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Christine L. Fontaine and R.A. Hulten of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment. However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact with respect to apparent authority (see Roach v. Szatko, 244 A.D.2d 470, 472; Maurillo v. Park Slope U-Haul, 194 A.D.2d 142, 147). Accordingly, the Supreme Court improperly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint where Charles Vizzini, the father of the defendant's president, might be found to have been acting as its agent.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kaziu v. Celluzziele LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Kaziu v. Celluzziele LLC

Case Details

Full title:BUJAR KAZIU, appellant, v. CELLUZZIELE LLC, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 874

Citing Cases

Time Warner City Cable v. Adelphi University

dence of the "consent of one person to allow another to act on his or her behalf and subject to his or her…

Gonzalez v. Beacon

The Supreme Court also properly denied those branches of the defendants' motion which were for summary…