From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaywood v. Mills College

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 14, 2005
No. C 04-03706 MMC (ADR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2005)

Opinion

No. C 04-03706 MMC (ADR).

September 14, 2005

ANTHONY J. SPERBER, LAW OFFICE OF ANTHONY J. SPERBER, Berkeley, California, Attorney for Plaintiff Marva A. Kaywood.

HENRY S. HEWITT, CLAUDIA J. GORHAM, ERICKSON, BEASLEY, HEWITT WILSON LLP, Oakland, California, Attorneys for Defendant Mills College.


STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED [ ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE [Rule 41(a)(ii)]


Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff Marva Kaywood and defendant Mills College, through their respective counsel, that this action, and each cause of action alleged therein, is dismissed without prejudice. I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document.

Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that:


Summaries of

Kaywood v. Mills College

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 14, 2005
No. C 04-03706 MMC (ADR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2005)
Case details for

Kaywood v. Mills College

Case Details

Full title:MARVA A. KAYWOOD, Plaintiff, v. MILLS COLLEGE, a California non-profit…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 14, 2005

Citations

No. C 04-03706 MMC (ADR) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2005)