From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaylon, Inc., v. Goldberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 26, 1934
154 Misc. 294 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

December 26, 1934.

Appeal from the City Court of New York, County of New York.

George Baker, for the appellant.

William E. Lowther [ Charles L. Hannelly of counsel], for the respondent.


As the motion to punish for contempt was not, as required by rule 10 of the court below, noticed for argument within thirty days of the commission of the alleged contempt, and no cause was shown for failure of compliance with the rule, the order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. ( Bongiorno v. McGurk, Appellate Term, 1st Dept. Nov. 1933.)

All concur; present, LYDON, HAMMER and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Kaylon, Inc., v. Goldberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 26, 1934
154 Misc. 294 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Kaylon, Inc., v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Proceedings Supplementary: KAYLON, INC., Judgment…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 26, 1934

Citations

154 Misc. 294 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
276 N.Y.S. 885