From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kay v. Kay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1949
276 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

December 19, 1949.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.


Order denying defendant's motion for counsel fee for the prosecution of her appeal from a judgment of divorce, which had been granted in this action in favor of plaintiff and against defendant after trial, and an additional sum of money to defray printing costs, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. Considering the statement in appellant's brief, on the present appeal, with respect to dispensing with the printing of the record on appeal from the judgment, as a motion for relief in connection with such printing, the motion is granted to the extent of permitting the appeal from the judgment to be prosecuted on the original papers, a typewritten transcript of the stenographer's minutes, and typewritten briefs, in view of the similar relief which this court granted for the prosecution of the appeal from the order, which has been affirmed herewith. Appellant is directed to file five typewritten copies of her brief and to serve one copy thereof on the attorney for the respondent. The typewritten brief shall be double spaced and each page shall contain not more than three folios.


Summaries of

Kay v. Kay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 1949
276 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Kay v. Kay

Case Details

Full title:ABE KAY, Respondent, v. EMILINE KAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1949

Citations

276 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)