From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kay Enterprises, Inc. v. Shawmac, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 9, 1971
183 S.E.2d 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

46362, 46363.

ARGUED JUNE 29, 1971.

DECIDED JULY 9, 1971.

Complaint. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Mitchell.

Bonner Rubin, S. Richard Rubin, Virginia A. Bonner, for appellants.

Edward D. Wheeler, for appellee.


These cases were tried together in the lower court. The defendants appeal form a directed verdict and judgment thereon for the plaintiff based on a motion for directed verdict by the plaintiff at the close of the plaintiff's evidence, without affording the defendants any opportunity to offer evidence. "A motion for a directed verdict may be made at the close of the evidence offered by an opponent or at the close of the case." Rule 50 (a); CPA § 50 (a) ( Code Ann. § 81A-150 (a)). Under this rule the defendant, but not the plaintiff, may move for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence for the plaintiff. The trial judge had no authority to direct a verdict for the plaintiff on motion of the plaintiff at this stage of the trial.

Judgments reversed. Quillian and Evans, JJ., concur.

ARGUED JUNE 29, 1971 — DECIDED JULY 9, 1971.


Summaries of

Kay Enterprises, Inc. v. Shawmac, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 9, 1971
183 S.E.2d 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Kay Enterprises, Inc. v. Shawmac, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KAY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. SHAWMAC, INC. KAY et al. v. SHAWMAC, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 9, 1971

Citations

183 S.E.2d 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
183 S.E.2d 503

Citing Cases

Pascoe Steel Corp. v. Turner County Board of Education

At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, only the defendant can move for a directed verdict. CPA 50 (a);…

Lowry v. Lomire

Even had there been a jury, it would have been error to grant the plaintiffs a directed verdict at the close…