From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kavelman v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1997
245 A.D.2d 9 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 2, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.).


In this landlord-tenant dispute, everyone agrees that venue should be changed from New York County, where all parties reside, because one of the defendants is a sitting Judge in that county and the other is a retired Judge who sat there for many years. However, we see no reason to transfer the action entirely out of the First Judicial Department to avoid even a possible appearance of impropriety inasmuch as there have been prior and pending proceedings between the same parties that have been transferred to Bronx County without apparent prejudice or complaint. In fact, a 1994 proceeding was transferred to the Bronx at defendants' specific request.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Kavelman v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1997
245 A.D.2d 9 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Kavelman v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:BUFF KAVELMAN et al., Appellants v. MARGARET TAYLOR et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 9 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 642

Citing Cases

Pruitt v. Patsalos

ue pursuant to CPLR 510(2), a movant is required to produce admissible factual evidence demonstrating a…

Lisa v. Parikh

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently denied the defendants' motion to change…