Opinion
Argued March 23, 1922
Decided April 18, 1922
Elbert N. Oakes for appellant.
Edward J. McCrossin for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario and Western Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1922
135 N.E. 933 (N.Y. 1922)
Summaries of
Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario and Western Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 18, 1922
135 N.E. 933 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for
Kavanagh v. New York, Ontario and Western Railway Co.
Case Details
Full title:KATHERINE KAVANAGH, as Administratrix of the Estate of JAMES KAVANAGH…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 18, 1922
Citations
135 N.E. 933 (N.Y. 1922)
135 N.E. 933
Citing Cases
Ricci v. Rolles
d the statute (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1233), nevertheless such violation does not per se subject him to…
Conroy v. SperlHe, therefore, has a cause of action irrespective of any question of scienter, since the defendant violated…