From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kautzman v. Bandler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 3, 1960
118 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

No. 59-502.

March 3, 1960.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Robert L. Floyd, J.

Hill, Welsh, Cornell, Ross Pyszka, Miami, for appellant.

Papy, Hames Stephens and Harry W. Birt, Jr., Miami, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court in Dade County, transferring a negligence action to the civil court of record, upon a determination by the trial judge of lack of jurisdiction based on insufficiency of the amount involved. The order appealed from was interlocutory. The appeal was improvidently filed because interlocutory appeals in common-law actions are limited to those from orders "relating to venue or jurisdiction over the person." Rule 4.2, subd. a, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.

As authorized by § 59.45, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., we have treated the appeal as a petition for certiorari, which is the appropriate procedure for review of such an order of transfer (Tantillo v. Miliman, Fla. 1956, 87 So.2d 413), and upon consideration thereof, certiorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

HORTON, C.J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kautzman v. Bandler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 3, 1960
118 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

Kautzman v. Bandler

Case Details

Full title:MAXINE L. KAUTZMAN, APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW S. BANDLER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 3, 1960

Citations

118 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

Citing Cases

Republic of Cuba v. Ritter

As authorized by statute, we have treated the notice of appeal as a petition for common-law certiorari. See…

Mendoza v. Farrell

At the outset we note the contention of the appellees that the transfer order is not appealable. We treat the…