From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaur v. Biggs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-3297 MCE EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-3297 MCE EFB

07-17-2012

Harjeet Kaur, Plaintiff, v. Michael C. Biggs, et al. Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

AUDREY B. HEMESATH

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

JOINT STATUS REPORT; ORDER

This is an immigration case in which petitioner challenges the decision of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) to deny a waiver of grounds of inadmissibility pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1882(a)(6)(C)(I), the denial of her Application By Refugee For Waiver of Grounds of Excludability, and her application for adjustment of status by CIS. The Court previously granted the parties' request that the case be held in abeyance, as CIS reopened the matter at the administrative level. As of the time of this filing, the matter remains open with CIS and there is no final administrative decision for this Court to review. CIS recently issued a Notice of Intent to Deny, and Plaintiff has an opportunity to respond to that Notice. Additional administrative proceedings may also be necessary. Under these circumstances, good cause exists to continue the period of abeyance of the federal lawsuit. The parties will submit a joint status report indicating the case progress, and setting forth a new proposed scheduling order if appropriate, by October 16, 2012.

Accordingly, good cause having been demonstrated, the parties respectfully request that the case continue to be held in abeyance pending a new decision from CIS.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: Audrey Hemesath

Audrey B. Hemesath

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for the Defendants

By: ____________________________

Robert B. Jobe

Attorney for the Plaintiff

ORDER

Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is held in abeyance. A joint status report shall be filed no later than October 16, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kaur v. Biggs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-3297 MCE EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Kaur v. Biggs

Case Details

Full title:Harjeet Kaur, Plaintiff, v. Michael C. Biggs, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-3297 MCE EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)