From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaufman v. Walter

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 1, 1925
125 Misc. 908 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)

Opinion

May 1, 1925.

Mark Rudich, for the appellant.

Cyrus S. Jullien, for the respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

We think the logical rule is where two or more claims arising out of the same contract are in existence when an action is brought upon one, a judgment in that action is a bar to an action upon the other. In coming to this conclusion we have not overlooked Perry v. Dickerson ( 85 N.Y. 345).


Summaries of

Kaufman v. Walter

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 1, 1925
125 Misc. 908 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
Case details for

Kaufman v. Walter

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS L. KAUFMAN, Appellant, v . ALFRED G. WALTER, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1925

Citations

125 Misc. 908 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
211 N.Y.S. 649