Opinion
May 1, 1925.
Mark Rudich, for the appellant.
Cyrus S. Jullien, for the respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.
We think the logical rule is where two or more claims arising out of the same contract are in existence when an action is brought upon one, a judgment in that action is a bar to an action upon the other. In coming to this conclusion we have not overlooked Perry v. Dickerson ( 85 N.Y. 345).