From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaufman v. Sweet et al., Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 29, 1963
156 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1963)

Opinion

Nos. 32143, 32198.

July 31, 1963. Rehearing Denied October 29, 1963.

Writs of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District; discharging certiorari 144 So.2d 515.

Alfred Gustinger, Jr., and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for petitioners-cross-respondents.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Hinckley Davant and Anthony Reinert, Miami, for respondents-cross-petitioners.


On the petition of Kaufman and the cross petition of Sweet, we granted certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, because of an apparent conflict with prior decisions of this Court. After oral argument on jurisdiction and merits, and upon further consideration of the record and briefs, we have concluded that the writ was improvidently issued for the reason that a jurisdictional conflict of decisions is not present.

The writ of certiorari heretofore issued is hereby discharged. See Nielsen v. City of Sarasota, Fla.App., 117 So.2d 731, discussion under headnote 6, Page 734.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C.J., ROBERTS, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., and JONES Circuit Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Kaufman v. Sweet et al., Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 29, 1963
156 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1963)
Case details for

Kaufman v. Sweet et al., Corporation

Case Details

Full title:IRMA KAUFMAN AND HER HUSBAND, HARRY KAUFMAN, PETITIONERS, v. SWEET ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 29, 1963

Citations

156 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1963)

Citing Cases

Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. Pearson

Kippy Corp. v. Colburn, 177 So.2d 193 (Fla. 1965); Lee v. Elliott, 155 So.2d 169 (3rd Dist.Ct.App.Fla. 1963);…

Landry v. Sterling Apartments, Inc.

All inferences from the evidence favorable to the party moved against should be accepted, Kaufman v. Sweet et…