From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaufman v. Glebe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Sep 28, 2011
CASE NO. 10-5445RJB/JRC (W.D. Wash. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10-5445RJB/JRC

09-28-2011

STEPHEN DOUGLAS KAUFMAN, Petitioner, v. PAT GLEBE. Respondent.


ORDER REGARDING A MOTION TO TRANSFER A DOCUMENT

INTO THIS ACTION AND A MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE A NEW

RESPONDENT

This 28 U.S.C. §2254 habeas corpus petition has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636 (b)(1)(A) and (B) and Local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. Petitioner is represented by counsel. This action was stayed on August 5, 2010 (ECF No. 4). That order specifically directed counsel to file a motion to reopen the case when the state court proceedings were complete. Counsel did not comply with the court's instructions and instead filed a separate petition under cause number 11-05534BHS/KLS. The second petition apparently raised grounds for relief that were not included in the original petition.

Petitioner then moved to consolidate the actions. The Court granted the motion to consolidate (ECF No. 8). Petitioner now asks the court to transfer the petition from 11-5534BHS/KLS into this action as a supplement to the original petition (ECF No. 16). Respondent does not oppose the motion (ECF No. 18). The motion is DENIED. Neither the court nor respondent's counsel should have to refer to multiple documents to determine what grounds for relief are before the court.

Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition that contains all grounds for relief in one document. The amended petition will act as a complete substitute and not an addendum to the original petition. The amended petition will be due on or before October 28, 2011. The amended petition will be titled "First Amended Petition." Failure to file the document on or before October 28, 2011 will result in a Report and Recommendation that the petition be dismissed.

Petitioner has also moved to substitute Pat Glebe as respondent (ECF No. 17). Again, the motion is unopposed (ECF No. 19. That motion is GRANTED.

J. Richard Creatura

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Kaufman v. Glebe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Sep 28, 2011
CASE NO. 10-5445RJB/JRC (W.D. Wash. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Kaufman v. Glebe

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN DOUGLAS KAUFMAN, Petitioner, v. PAT GLEBE. Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 10-5445RJB/JRC (W.D. Wash. Sep. 28, 2011)